Search the site or the web here for more celebrity gossip

Google
 

Monday, May 5, 2008

THIS DIRTY BASTARD IS GOING TO JAIL

Yes im talking about nasty ass R. Kelly. A new witness for the prosecution claims she had a threesome with R. Kelly and the then teenage girl featured in one of his many videos. The girl in the video is denying that it is her but this new witness plans on identifying her. Where in the hell is Chris Hansen when you need him? Wouldn't that have been some funny shit if they would have caught R.Kelly on Dateline NBC? He would've probably got all undressed as soon as he walked in to the door, sat on one of the barstools and started snacking on the milk and cookies left for him. OMG they need to bring that show back just to see if they could catch R.kellys peeing on underage girls ass. Any how here's what they are saying about the new witness.

A woman is set to testify at R. Kelly’s upcoming child pornography trial that she had a three-way sexual encounter with Kelly and the allegedly underage girl shown in the video at the heart of the case. The 41-year-old R&B superstar is accused of videotaping himself having sex with a girl estimated to be 13 or 14. He has pleaded not guilty. Jury selection is set to begin Friday. As part of the case, prosecutors claim to have identified the girl in the videotape. This alleged victim is now in her 20s. Kelly’s lawyers plan to argue — and the alleged victim will reportedly testify — that she is not the girl in the tape. But the prosecution’s new witness could undermine that defense, since she will identify the girl, sources with knowledge of the matter told the Chicago Sun-Times. In addition, the witness is expected to say the girl was underage at the time of their encounter.

“She was involved in a threesome with [the girl] and R. Kelly.”

1 comments:

mike belgrove said...

Ok, someone help me figure this out cause I'm confused. Juan over at Highbrid Nation told me that this new witness has popped up and is saying that she knows that the girl was underage because she joined Kelly and the underage girl in a threesome. So that makes her guilty and Kelly right? Or was she underage also? Which would make Kelly guity in another underage case. Kelly is off the chain.